Legal Opinion

Carr v. Associates Discount Corp.

United States District Court

Decided September 23, 1941No. 2878Published

1Opinion of the CourtHenchey, J.

(Pettingell, A.P.J., & Wilson, J.)—In this action of tort the plaintiffs seek damages for an alleged conversion by the defendant of a Ford phaeton automobile.

There seems to be little, if any, dispute as to the facts involved. The plaintiffs bought the car in. question from Siegal’s Auto Sales Co. under a conditional sales contract, dated May 14, 1938, and signed by both plaintiffs. The selling price Was $424, of which $145 was paid down and the balance of $279 (including a finance charge of $59, of which $20 was for insurance and the remainder for interest and carrying charges), was payable…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Thomas G. Jewett, Jr. Inc. v. Keystone Driller Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
  2. Donahue v. LeventhalMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  3. Marcotte v. Massachusetts Security Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
  4. Package Confectionery Co. v. PerkitMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
  5. Sherman v. Connecticut Mutual Life InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1915

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API