Legal Opinion

Bousquet v. Mack Motor Truck Co.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided November 26, 1929PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWait, J.

The plaintiff sues to recover the value of two solid truck tires which he sold one Helmerich on September 21, 1926, by conditional sale, retaining title until full payment was made. Helmerich had purchased a truck from the defendant by contract of conditional sale on February 20, 1926, the defendant retaining title until full compliance with the conditions of the contract, with a right of repos*201session in case of default. Helmerich made default on September 20, and on October 1 the defendant took possession of the truck. The tires were placed upon this truck before the repossession, and before…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. De Young v. Frank A. Andrews Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
  2. Clark v. WellsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1872
  3. Lynn Morris Plan Co. v. GordonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925
  4. Blackwood Tire & Vulcanizing Co. v. Auto Storage Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Wentworth v. S. A. Woods Machine Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1895

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Bank of America v. J. & S. AUTO REPAIRSArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Marsh v. S. M. S. Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  3. Colella v. Essex County Acceptance Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
  4. Atlas Assurance Co., Ltd. v. GibbsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1936
  5. Goodrich Silvertown Stores v. Pratt Motor Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1936

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API