Legal Opinion

Berenato v. Gazzara

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 6, 1943No. Appeal, 252PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Patterson,

This was an action in equity to set aside an alleged fraudulent conveyance of real estate.

The material averments of the hill are as follows: that in an action of assumpsit started July 3, 1939, Angelo Berenato and Raymond Berenato, coal dealers trading as A. Berenato & Son, recovered a judgment against Rosario Gazzara for coal sold and delivered in the sum of $3,980.61; that on October 10, 1934, Rosario Gazzara became owner of premises 2333 South 16th Street, Philadelphia; that on June 13, 1938, Rosario Gazzara and Grazia, his wife, conveyed the property to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Kauffman v. KauffmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  2. Burkhart v. Farmers' Union Ass'nSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1899
  3. Flory v. HouckSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1898
  4. Sackett v. SpencerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1870
  5. Buchner v. BuchnerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Malamed v. SedelskySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  2. Robbins Investment Co. v. Green Rose Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1968
  3. Ehnes v. YowellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  4. Merchants National Bank v. SullivanSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1951
  5. Huss v. SmithDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API