Legal Opinion

Huss v. Smith

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided March 26, 1957No. Civ. A. Nos. 14775-14777PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

VAN DUSEN, District Judge.

The trial judge makes the following findings of fact and conclusions of law:

I. Findings of Fact

1. Plaintiffs, George Huss, Wesley Huss and Russell Huss, during the years 1944 to 1947, were members of a partnership engaged in the business of mining *226coal by the strip mining method, with a principal place of business at Ringtown, Schuylkill County, Pa.

2. Pursuant to written agreements with the Philadelphia and Reading Coal & Iron Co. (hereinafter called “Reading”), denominated P-22, P-22B, P-29, P-32 and P-35, dated, respectively, May 27, 1944, February 23, 1945, May 8,…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Burton-Sutton Oil Co. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Anderson v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  3. George Moore Ice Cream Co. v. RoseSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  4. Commissioner v. Southwest Exploration Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
  5. Kirby Petroleum Co. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1946

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Abdulhay v. Bethlehem Medical Arts, L.P.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API