Legal Opinion

Malamed v. Sedelsky

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 21, 1951No. Appeal, 132PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Ladner,

This is an appeal from a judgment for plaintiff entered on the pleadings in an action to quiet the title of real estate acquired at a sheriffs sale. The relevant facts are not in dispute and are as follows: Defendants, Harry Sedelsky and Selma, his wife, purchased 7224 Rutland Street, Philadelphia, which is the real estate in question, paid the down money and took title in. the name of Sidney Pastner, who is Selma’s brother and a veteran soldier. This was done in order that a mortgage might be secured from the Veterans’ Administration. Such a mortgage in the sum…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Atlantic Refining Co. v. Wyoming National BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  2. Sidle v. KaufmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  3. Woods v. FarmereSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1838
  4. Mower v. MowerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  5. Kinch Et Ux. v. FlukeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Butler, Bernard, Butler, Mary v. Lomas and Nettleton Company, the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, Appeal of Lomas and Nettleton CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
  2. Highland v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  3. Kretschman v. StollSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  4. Fowler v. Rauso (In Re Fowler)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
  5. Pato v. CernuskaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API