Legal Opinion

Ehnes v. Yowell

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 27, 1953No. Appeal, 35PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Chief Justice Horace Stern,

A bill in equity filed by the plaintiff, Fred C. Ehnes, a creditor of the defendant, Cleveland Yowell, alleged that certain lots of land were conveyed by the latter to his son, the defendant, Edward J. Yowell, without consideration and in fraud of plaintiff’s claim. Plaintiff prayed that in accordance with the Uniform Fraudulent Conveyance Act of May 21, 1921, P. L. 1045, section 9, defendant Edward and his wife be ordered to reconvey the property to defendant Cleveland and his wife.

Elaborate testimony taken in the proceedings revealed that in 1930…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Kauffman v. KauffmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  2. General Casmir Pulaski Building & Loan Ass'n v. Provident Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  3. Malamed v. SedelskySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  4. Burns v. Coyne Et Ux.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  5. Rochester Trust Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1914

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Kohr v. KohrSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  2. Crane v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1967
  3. Penn Mutual Life Insurance v. FinkelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  4. Hunter v. Hunter, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Cumberland County1981
  5. Bowen v. Bowen, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Montgomery County1959

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API