Legal Opinion

State v. Ehr

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided January 2, 1934No. File No. Cr. 110PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Burr, Ch. J.

The defendant was convicted of the crime of grand larceny. From the judgment of conviction and from the order denying his motion for a new trial he appeals.

The specifications of error are numerous but we concern ourselves with but four issues raised.

The information charges, among other things, that the defendants did “take, steal and carry away one Model A Ford Coupe Motor A 3761346, then and there the property of Corwin-Churchill, etc.” The proof shows the real name of the owner to be Corwin-Churchill Motors, Inc., a corporation. Appellant says such variance in the name is fatal.

I…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. People v. SingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
  2. People v. Leong QuongCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
  3. State v. HazerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Commonwealth v. JacobsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1890
  5. State v. PotterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1922

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. NewNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1947
  2. State v. RudolphNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1971
  3. State v. BoehmNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1938
  4. State v. ShepardNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API