State v. Hazer
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtNuessle, J.
The defendants, Adolph Hazer and Eudolph Hazer, were jointly charged with and convicted of the crime of grand larceny. Thereafter they moved for a new trial, which motion was denied. From the judgment of conviction and from the order denying the motion for a new trial, the defendants now appeal to this court.
As grounds for reversal, the appellants urge: the insufficiency of the evidence to sustain the verdict; errors of the trial court in rulings on questions of evidence; other errors of law occurring during the trial; error in giving and in failing to give proper and sufficient instructions…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Aylmer v. AdamsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1915
- State v. CrayNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1915
- State v. KernsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1924
- State v. BoweNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1928
- State v. ThompsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1928
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- State v. IversonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1971
- Mevorah v. GoodmanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1953
- State v. McLainNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
- State v. JagerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1958
- State v. JagerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1957
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.