Commonwealth v. Cruttenden
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Justice McCaffery.
The issue in this discretionary appeal is whether a police officer violates the Pennsylvania Wiretapping and Electronic Surveillance Act (“Wiretap Act” or “Act”), 18 *96Pa.C.S. § 5701, et seq., when he communicates directly with a suspect via cell phone text messages while pretending to be the suspect’s accomplice.1 Because an officer who directly communicates with another person by text-messaging is not eavesdropping or listening in on a conversation, but is himself engaging in the communication, and because for purposes of the Wiretap Act, it is irrelevant that an…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. TurkCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
- Commonwealth v. MillerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
- Commonwealth v. ProettoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Commonwealth v. DiSilvioSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Commonwealth v. SmithSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Ashley Popa v. Harriet Carter Gifts Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2022
- Commonwealth v. SpenceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Commonwealth v. DiegoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
- Commonwealth v. LynnSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- Ashley Popa v. Harriet Carter Gifts Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2022
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.