Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Cruttenden

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 17, 2012PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Justice McCaffery.

The issue in this discretionary appeal is whether a police officer violates the Pennsylvania Wiretapping and Electronic Surveillance Act (“Wiretap Act” or “Act”), 18 *96Pa.C.S. § 5701, et seq., when he communicates directly with a suspect via cell phone text messages while pretending to be the suspect’s accomplice.1 Because an officer who directly communicates with another person by text-messaging is not eavesdropping or listening in on a conversation, but is himself engaging in the communication, and because for purposes of the Wiretap Act, it is irrelevant that an…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. TurkCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
  2. Commonwealth v. MillerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  3. Commonwealth v. ProettoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  4. Commonwealth v. DiSilvioSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  5. Commonwealth v. SmithSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Ashley Popa v. Harriet Carter Gifts Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2022
  2. Commonwealth v. SpenceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  3. Commonwealth v. DiegoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  4. Commonwealth v. LynnSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  5. Ashley Popa v. Harriet Carter Gifts Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2022

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API