Legal Opinion

Hille v. Neale

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided January 28, 1904No. 4,793PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Erom Vanderburgh Circuit Court; H. A. Mattison, 'Judge. Proceeding by Charles Hille against John A. Neale, township trustee, to be relieved from an assessment for cleaning and repairing a ditch. Erom a judgment for defendant, plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtComstock, J.

This proceeding was an agreed case under §562 Brims 1894, §553 R. S.. 1881. The following is a substantial copy of the agreed statement of facts: At all the times hereinafter mentioned said Hille and A^ro Dyer have been the owners in fee, as tenants in common, of a tract of land in Union township, Vanderburgh county, Indiana, containing 156 acres; said Hille has been the separate owner in fee of another tract of land in said township containing 216 acres; said Dyer has been the separate owner in fee of another tract of land in said township containing eighty acres; Robert J. Stroud has been…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Southern Pacific Co. v. Block Bros.Texas Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Fanning v. KrapflSupreme Court of Iowa · 1883
  3. Bloomfield Railroad v. BurressIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Beatty v. PrudenIndiana Court of Appeals · 1895
  5. Morgan v. WoodsIndiana Supreme Court · 1870

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Brown v. American Tile & Pottery Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1931
  2. Dulick v. Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API