Legal Opinion

Beatty v. Pruden

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided November 6, 1895No. 1,657PublishedCited by 9 opinions

From the Jackson Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtReinhard, J.

-This action was instituted in the court below by the appellee as trustee of Hamilton township, in Jackson county, against the appellant to reimburse the former for costs and expenses incurred in cleaning out the appellant’s allotment of a public ditch, and to foreclose a lien therefor upon appellant’s real estate. One of the errors assigned and discussed is the overruling of the appellant’s demurrer to the appellee’s complaint.

Appellant’s counsel insist that the complaint is insufficient for failing to set forth in detail “all the facts necessary to the legal establishment of the alleged…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Quarl v. AbbettIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Town of Cicero v. WilliamsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Van Sickle v. BelknapIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Davis v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Trimble v. McGeeIndiana Supreme Court · 1887

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Skelton v. SharpIndiana Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Zimmerman v. SavageIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Mayor of Hagerstown v. StartzmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1901
  4. Roundenbush v. MitchellIndiana Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Board of Commissioners v. TrotterIndiana Court of Appeals · 1898

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API