Legal Opinion

New York, New Haven, & Hartford Railroad v. York & Whitney Co.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 24, 1913PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C. J.

This is an action to recover a balance of freight charges which through the carrier’s mistake had not been claimed or collected at the time of the delivery of the goods. The case was submitted to a judge of the Superior Court* on an agreed statement of facts with power to draw proper inferences. The material points are that sweet potatoes were shipped by one Culver from Delmar in the State of Delaware to the defendant, a dealer and commission merchant in large business at Boston. The extent of the defendant’s business was not fully known to the plaintiff. The goods were shipped to the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. MottleySupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. Armour Packing Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  3. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  4. Chicago & Alton Railroad v. KirbySupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  5. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. MuggSupreme Court of the United States · 1906

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Young v. DuncanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  2. Lipsitz v. ParrCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1933
  3. Pennsylvania R.R. Co. v. . TitusNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
  4. Beacon Hill Civic Ass'n v. Ristorante Toscano, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996
  5. Great Northern Ry. Co. v. HyderDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1922

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API