Legal Opinion

Lipsitz v. Parr

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided February 15, 1933No. [No. 112, October Term, 1932.]PublishedCited by 77 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtParke, J.

Morris Lipsitz, trading as Northwestern Lumber Company, began on February 16th, 1932, a proceeding in the Circuit Court of Baltimore City, against William A. Parr, buildings engineer of the Mayor and City Council of Baltimore City, and the named members of the hoard of zoning appeals of Baltimore City, to restrain these defendants and their agents from interfering with a permit, issued on January 4th, 1932, to the plaintiff, to erect a building in which to manufacture ice at the northwest corner • of Calhoun and Winchester Streets, in Baltimore City.

Two days after the permit was given, the…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Hadacheck v. SebastianSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  3. Nectow v. City of CambridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  4. Zahn v. Board of Public WorksSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  5. Mayor of Baltimore v. RadeckeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1878

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by77 opinions

  1. Salisbury Beauty Schools v. State Board of CosmetologistsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1973
  2. Bureau of Mines v. George's Creek Coal and Land Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
  3. Langston v. RiffeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
  4. Marzullo v. KahlCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  5. Inlet Associates v. Assateague House Condominium Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1988

72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API