Legal Opinion

Great Northern Ry. Co. v. Hyder

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided April 15, 1922No. 3429PublishedCited by 33 opinions

At Daw. Action by the Great Northern Railway Company against May Hyder, doing business as the Hyder Furnace Company. On demurrer to answer and to affirmative defense.

1Opinion of the Court

CUSHMANj District Judge.

Plaintiff, a common carrier in interstate commerce by rail, sues the defendant for an unpaid freight charge on a carload of freight consigned and shipped from Des Moines, Iowa, to defendant at Tacoma, Wash., over the Chicago, Burlington & Quincy and Great Northern Railroads. The complaint alleges the establishment of a joint freight rate over such lines for such shipments,'and tiie filing with the Interstate Commerce Commission of such freight tiriff, and its posting and publication. It is further alleged that the bill of lading provided:

“The owner or consignee shall…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. FinkSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  2. Pennsylvania R.R. Co. v. . TitusNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
  3. New York, New Haven, & Hartford Railroad v. York & Whitney Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
  4. Central Railroad v. MacCartneySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1902
  5. Bates v. KingsleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Missouri Pacific Railroad Company v. National Milling Company, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1969
  2. Western & Atlantic R. v. UnderwoodDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1922
  3. United States v. Mason & Dixon Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1955
  4. Missouri Pacific Railroad Co. v. National Milling Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1967
  5. Griffin Grocery Co. v. Pennsylvania RailroadCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1956

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API