Legal Opinion

Holmes v. Corthell

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided January 4, 1888PublishedCited by 5 opinions

"Any person injured in his comfort, property, or the enjoyment of his estate, by a common and public, or a private nuisance, may maintain against the offender an fiction on the case for his damages, unless otherwise specially provided.” R. S., c. 17, § 12. In Ashby v. White, Lord Raymond, 938, Lord Holt says, "If men will multiply injuries, actions must be multiplied too; for every man that is injured ought to have his recompense.”

Read the full summary

"Any person injured in his comfort, property, or the enjoyment of his estate, by a common and public, or a private nuisance, may maintain against the offender an fiction on the case for his damages, unless otherwise specially provided.” R. S., c. 17, § 12. In Ashby v. White, Lord Raymond, 938, Lord Holt says, "If men will multiply injuries, actions must be multiplied too; for every man that is injured ought to have his recompense.” The case of Brown v. Watson explains the law fully. 47 Maine, 161. The court says, " Those who have no occasion of business or pleasure to pass over a road so…

1Opinion of the CourtHaskell-, J.

Trespass for obstructing a public waj' by building a stone wall across it, whereby the plaintiff claims to have suffered special damage.

*33The distinction between trespass and trespass on the case is abolished by R. S., c. 82, § 15. "A declaration in either form is good.” Hathorn v. Eaton, 70 Maine, 219.

It is settled in this state that one who suffers special injury, no matter how inconsiderable, from a common nuisance, may recover damages in an action at law from the person creating it; R. S., c. 17, § 12; Brown v. Watson, 47 Maine, 161 ; Dudley v. Kennedy, 63 Maine, 465 ; and from the person…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Foley v. H. F. Farnham Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1936
  2. Smedberg v. Moxie Dam Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1952
  3. Graham v. LowdenSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1940
  4. HIGGINS v. HUHTAMAKI INCDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2024
  5. Kennebunk, Kennebunkport & Wells Water District v. Maine Turnpike AuthoritySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API