Legal Opinion

HIGGINS v. HUHTAMAKI INC

District Court, D. Maine

Decided August 30, 2024No. 1:21-cv-00369Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE LAWRENCE HIGGINS, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs ) ) v. ) 1:21-cv-00369-JCN ) HUHTAMAKI, INC., et al., ) ) Defendants ) ORDER ON MOTION TO AMEND AND MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS Plaintiffs, homeowners in Fairfield, Maine, allege Defendants, which consist of the operator of a paper mill in Waterville, Maine, and three chemical companies, are responsible for contaminating their groundwater wells and property from per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS). (Complaint, ECF No. 1-1; Third Amended Complaint, ECF No. 227.) Residual PFAS from the paper…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Palmer v. Champion MortgageCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2006
  4. Perez Acevedo v. Rivero CubanoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2008
  5. Sivetts v. Board of County CommissionersCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API