Legal Opinion

Foley v. H. F. Farnham Co.

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided December 8, 1936PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDunn, C. J.

After the conclusion of the evidence, the Superior Court reported these cases, the parties consenting, for final decision, with regard both to facts and law, on such of the evidence as is legally admissible.

The actions are against the owner and occupier of a sash and blind factory, closely fronting a Portland street, to recover damages for personal injuries to two pedestrians, who, one becoming *30wearied, approached from the street, and sat upon a doorsill of the building, where a falling sign hurt them.

■ The counts in the declaration in the writs predicate liability on the theory that the…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Bennett v. Railroad Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1881
  2. United Zinc & Chemical Co. v. BrittSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  3. Carleton v. Franconia Iron & Steel Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
  4. Herman v. . City of BuffaloNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
  5. Frost v. Eastern RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1886

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Morgan v. High Penn Oil Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  2. Keesecker v. G. M. McKelvey Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1943
  3. State v. TulloSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1976
  4. Lewis v. MainsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1954
  5. Hand v. NickersonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1953

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API