Legal Opinion
Graham v. Lowden
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided August 28, 1940PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSturgis, J.
Action on the case for nuisance. At the return term, a special demurrer to the declaration for duplicity was filed and overruled. The demurrant brings the case to the Law Court on exceptions.
The gist of the declaration is that the plaintiff, Percy Graham, is the owner of a lot of land in the Town of Boothbay with the buildings thereon with an adjoining right of way extending from the road leading from East Boothbay to Ocean Point to the waters of Linekin Bay, and that the defendant, George M. Lowden, to injure and vex the plaintiff and exclude him from the use and enjoyment of his property,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Milton v. PufferMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
- Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. InabinetteCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
- Holmes v. CorthellSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1888
- Wolfe v. Beecher Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1879
- Peoples National Bank v. NickersonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1910
3Cited by4 opinions
- Franklin Property Trust v. Foresite, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
- Hanlin Group, Inc. v. International Minerals & Chemical Corp.District Court, D. Maine · 1990
- Fine Line, Inc. v. BlakeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996
- Curtis Funeral Home, Inc. v. Smith Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1945