Legal Opinion

O'Connor v. Armstrong

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 3, 1930No. Appeal, 73PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Simpson,

Appellants correctly say that the only question to be decided on this appeal is whether or not “the county commissioners of Allegheny County can resubmit the charter for the Consolidated City of Pittsburgh in its original form to the electors of Allegheny County, without further legislation” than is contained in the Act of April 18, 1929, P. L. 573. This statute was passed in pursuance of authority given by the amendment to article XY, section 4, of the Constitution of the State, and directs that the charter detailed in it shall be submitted to the electors for…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Busser v. SnyderSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  2. Monongahela Navigation Co. v. CoonsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1843
  3. Commonwealth v. DabbierioSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  4. Page v. AllenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1868
  5. Commonwealth v. McAfeeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1911

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. HarmonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  2. Pennsylvania Prison Society v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  3. Ellsworth v. LauthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  4. Behrend v. Bell Telephone Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  5. Pennsylvania Prison Society v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API