Commonwealth v. Harmon
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
NIX, Justice.
The singular question presented in this appeal is whether the Constitution of this Commonwealth mandates that an accused who has been tried and convicted in the Municipal Court and who is entitled to a trial de novo in the Court of Common Pleas is also entitled to a relitigation of a previously determined pre-trial motion to suppress evidence. Relying upon its decision in Commonwealth v. White, 228 Pa.Super. 23, 324 A.2d 469 (1974), a majority of the members of the Superior Court ruled that General Court Regulation 72-7, promulgated by the President Judges of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Johnson v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Commonwealth v. DeMichelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
- Busser v. SnyderSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
- Moers v. City of ReadingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1853
- Commonwealth v. SitesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by74 opinions
- Parker v. Children's Hospital of Phila.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Zemprelli v. DanielsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Paulinski v. IsaacSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Commonwealth v. MonarchSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Commonwealth v. SampleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.