Behrend v. Bell Telephone Co.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
JACOBS, President Judge:
This case is before us on remand from the Supreme Court 1 to decide whether the limitation of damages provision of Bell’s tariff is valid under Article III, Section 18 of the Pennsylvania Constitution:
“The General Assembly may enact [workmen’s compensation laws] . . but in no other cases shall the General Assembly limit the amount to be recovered . for injuries to persons or property . . ..” (Emphasis added.)
After a studied consideration of the able arguments of both parties, we conclude that Bell’s tariff is not violative of the above-quoted constitutional provision.
We…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Jackson v. Metropolitan Edison Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Singer v. SheppardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Feingold v. Bell of PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Behrend v. Bell Telephone Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Commonwealth v. HarmonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Bash v. Bell Telephone Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Valhal Corp. v. Sullivan Associates, Inc., Architects, Planners, EngineersCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Pinnacle Computer Services, Inc. v. Ameritech Publishing, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1994
- Danisco Ingredients USA, Inc. v. Kansas City Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1999
- Houston Lighting & Power Co. v. Auchan USA, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1999
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.