Legal Opinion

Hardy v. Mayhew

California Supreme Court

Decided June 28, 1910No. Sac. No. 1777PublishedCited by 51 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtAngellotti, J.

This is an appeal by defendants from a judgment given against them in an action brought by plaintiff to obtain a decree that she is the owner of an undivided one fourth of certain property, real and personal, possessed by them and of which they claim to be the absolute owners, and to obtain an accounting as to said property and a delivery to her of her share or the reasonable value thereof.

The defendants are Frank J. Mayhew and Charles P. May-hew, sons, and Mary E. Phipps, daughter of Judge Horace Allen Mayhew, who died March 3, 1907, and of Mary Jane Mayhew, who died August 3, 1903, and W.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Brant v. Virginia Coal & Iron Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Giles v. LittleSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  3. Martinovich v. MarsicanoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Mansfield v. SheltonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1896
  5. Wager v. . WagerNew York Court of Appeals · 1884

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. Estate of RathCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Tax Commission v. OswaldOhio Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Luscomb v. FintzelbergCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Pearson v. State Social Welfare BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Bliss v. Security-First National BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API