Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Donnaruma v. Carter

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 11, 2013PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Richard M. Platkin, J.

On May 23, 2013, Colin Donnaruma, Daniel Morrissey, Eric Catine and Timothy Holmes (collectively the Occupy petitioners) commenced a special proceeding (proceeding No. 1) pursuant to CPLR article 78, seeking to compel the Honorable William A. Carter to dismiss the criminal charges pending against them in Albany City Court. Judge Carter has filed an answer in opposition to their verified petition (the Occupy petition).

Albany County District Attorney E David Soares did not file any response to the Occupy petition, but he did commence a second special…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Young v. United States Ex Rel. Vuitton Et Fils S. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Legal Aid Society of Sullivan County, Inc. v. ScheinmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. People v. AndersonNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. La Rocca v. LaneNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  5. Dondi v. JonesNew York Court of Appeals · 1976

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Matter of P. David Soares v. William A. CarterNew York Court of Appeals · 2015
  2. People v. FrancoKinderhook Justice Court · 2016
  3. Soares v. CarterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  4. People v. GrossmanKinderhook Justice Court · 2017
  5. Soares v. CarterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API