Legal Opinion
United States v. Haynes
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 16, 2000No. Nos. 98-30221, 98-30240PublishedCited by 51 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge McKEOWN; Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge REINHARDT.
McKEOWN, Circuit Judge:
At the conclusion of a three-year investigation, Gregory Haynes (“Haynes”) and James Denton (“Denton”) were arrested and indicted for manufacturing marijuana, conspiring to manufacture marijuana, and conspiring to commit money laundering. During the investigation, law enforcement relied on information provided by Dale Fairbanks (“Fairbanks”), a private investigator who worked for an attorney who represented Haynes and Denton during the initial phase of the investigation.
Claiming…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Koon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- United States v. CalandraSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. HastingSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. CrewsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- United States v. Steve Navarro-Vargas, United States of America v. Jose Antonio Leon-JassoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. David Francis Marcucci, United States of America v. Christopher Leyva-Garcia, United States of America v. David Gamboa-AristeguiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- United States v. BinghamCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- United States v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. NavarroCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.