United States v. Hector
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
O’SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judge:
As between the prosecutor and the trial judge, who determines which conviction to vacate when a defendant has been convicted of multiplicitous offenses in violation of the Double Jeopardy Clause?
I
Ricky Hector possessed child pornography through a peer-to-peer network which allowed for file-sharing. He pled guilty to both receipt (Count I) and possession (Count II) of child pornography. See 18 U.S.C. §§ 2252A(a)(2) (receipt); 2252A(a)(5)(b) (possession). Shortly after he pled, we decided United States v. Davenport, 519 F.3d 940 (9th Cir.2008), which held that…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. Alfred Arnold AmelineCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Ball v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Sansone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Rinaldi v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- United States v. KennedyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- People v. RheaColorado Court of Appeals · 2014
- Commonwealth v. RivasMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2013
- United States v. MaierCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- United States v. KingDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2010
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.