Legal Opinion

United States v. Hector

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 18, 2009No. 08-30271PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

O’SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judge:

As between the prosecutor and the trial judge, who determines which conviction to vacate when a defendant has been convicted of multiplicitous offenses in violation of the Double Jeopardy Clause?

I

Ricky Hector possessed child pornography through a peer-to-peer network which allowed for file-sharing. He pled guilty to both receipt (Count I) and possession (Count II) of child pornography. See 18 U.S.C. §§ 2252A(a)(2) (receipt); 2252A(a)(5)(b) (possession). Shortly after he pled, we decided United States v. Davenport, 519 F.3d 940 (9th Cir.2008), which held that…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. United States v. Alfred Arnold AmelineCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  3. Ball v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Sansone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. Rinaldi v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. United States v. KennedyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  2. People v. RheaColorado Court of Appeals · 2014
  3. Commonwealth v. RivasMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2013
  4. United States v. MaierCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  5. United States v. KingDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2010

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API