Legal Opinion
United States v. Maier
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 27, 2011No. 09-10397PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
The opinion filed on April 27, 2011 and published at 639 F.3d 927 (9th Cir.2011), is AMENDED as follows. In the second paragraph of Section III, the last sentence reads:
“[W]e may reverse if, upon reviewing the record, we have a definite and firm conviction that the district court committed a clear error of judgment in the conclusion it reached upon weighing the relevant factors.” United States v. Amezcua-Vasquez, 567 F.3d 1050, 1055 (9th Cir.2009).
This sentence is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following text and footnote:
The en banc decision in United States v. Hinkson,…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- United States v. BatchelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Rutledge v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- United States v. Amezcua-VasquezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. OvertonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- United States v. ParkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2014
- Commonwealth v. RivasMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2013
- United States v. Davonya GrantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- United States v. RothwellDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2012
- United States v. RessamCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.