Legal Opinion
(PS) Ward v. Department of Child Protective Services
District Court, E.D. California
Decided August 28, 2020No. 2:19-cv-00652Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MICHAEL N. WARD, No. 2:19-cv-652-MCE-EFB PS 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 DEPARTMENT OF CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES, MEGAN 15 DANIELS, MARINA CHAMBERS, 16 Defendants. 17 18 Plaintiff seeks leave to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915.1 His 19 declaration makes the showing required by 28 U.S.C. §1915(a)(1) and (2). See ECF No. 2. 20 Accordingly, the request to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). 21 Determining that plaintiff may proceed in forma pauperis does not…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Michael Henry Ferdik v. Joe Bonzelet, SheriffCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.