Legal Opinion

Patel v. Facebook Inc.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided February 26, 2018No. Case No. 3:15–cv–03747–JDPublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JAMES DONATO, United States District Judge

In this putative class action case under the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act, 740 Ill. Comp. Stat. 14/1 et seq. ("BIPA"), named plaintiffs allege that defendant Facebook, Inc. ("Facebook") unlawfully collected and stored their biometric data without prior notice or consent. Dkt. No. 40. Facebook asks to dismiss the case under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) and Spokeo, Inc. v. Robins , --- U.S. ----, 136 S.Ct. 1540, 194 L.Ed.2d 635 (2016) ( Spokeo I ) on the ground that plaintiffs have failed to allege a concrete injury in fact.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Spokeo, Inc. v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  3. United States Department of Justice v. Reporters Committee for Freedom of the PressSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Safe Air for Everyone v. MeyerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  5. Chandler v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Rosenbach v. Six Flags Entertainment Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 2019
  2. Rosenbach v. Six Flags Entertainment Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 2019
  3. Tims v. Black Horse Carriers, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2021
  4. Rivera v. Google, Inc.District Court, E.D. Illinois · 2018
  5. Acaley v. Vimeo, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2020

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API