Legal Opinion

Vazquez De Mercado v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 15, 2007No. G037194PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

RYLAARSDAM, J.

Plaintiffs and real parties in interest Thomas McClung and Maria McClung allege that before they purchased a horse, they employed defendant and petitioner Rodrigo Vazquez de Mercado, a veterinarian, to examine it and advise whether it was suitable for their purposes. They sued defendant for allegedly failing to advise them of the horse’s physical problem before their purchase, seeking punitive damages. Defendant claims plaintiffs were required to obtain a court order under Code of Civil Procedure section 425.13 (all further statutory references are to this code unless…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Central Pathology Service Medical Clinic, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Stephens v. County of TulareCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Palmer v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  4. Williamson v. PridaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Scharer v. San Luis Rey Equine Hospital, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API