Legal Opinion

Williamson v. Prida

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 18, 1999No. B122920PublishedCited by 6 opinions

[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ARMSTRONG, J.

Helmuth Von Bluecher and Hector Prida are doctors of veterinary They a by Robert Marshall, Michael Jarvis, and Warren B. Williamson (the owners). In early May of 1993, Dr. Prida, who worked for Dr. Von Bluecher, 1 gave Latin American three injections of Oxytetracycline to the jugular. Later that month, Latin American developed a thrombosis, which caused a large swelling on his neck. The owners brought this lawsuit for veterinary malpractice, contending that the Oxytetracycline injections were not necessary and were given in a negligent manner, that the thrombosis was a…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Lawless v. CalawayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Landeros v. FloodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Huffman v. LindquistCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Osborn v. Irwin Memorial Blood BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  5. Rasmussen v. ShickleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Avivi v. Centro Medico Urgente Medical CenterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  2. Loman v. FreemanAppellate Court of Illinois · 2006
  3. Baechler v. BeaunauxCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
  4. Vazquez De Mercado v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  5. Loman v. FreemanAppellate Court of Illinois · 2006

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API