Legal Opinion

Central Pathology Service Medical Clinic, Inc. v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Decided July 31, 1992No. S021168PublishedCited by 83 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

LUCAS, C. J.

Real parties in interest (plaintiffs) brought suit against petitioners (defendants) alleging claims based on negligent medical practices. Subsequently, plaintiffs were permitted to amend their complaint to add two causes of action based on intentional tort theories and to claim punitive damages for those intentional torts. The trial court (respondent) concluded Code of Civil Procedure section 425.13,1 restricting prayers for punitive damages in actions “arising out of the professional negligence of a health care provider,” did not apply to plaintiffs’ punitive damages…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. People v. MorrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Taylor v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Smith, Valentino & Smith, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Walnut Creek Manor v. Fair Employment & Housing CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Bailey v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by83 opinions

  1. College Hospital, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Delaney v. BakerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Henry v. Lehman Commercial Paper, Inc. (In Re First Alliance Mortgage Co.)Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2006
  4. Henry v. Lehman Commercial Paper, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  5. Flowers v. Torrance Memorial Hospital Medical CenterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994

78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API