Legal Opinion

Palmer v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 19, 2002No. D040486PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HUFFMAN, J.

Petitioner William Palmer, plaintiff in an underlying action against his health maintenance organization, PacifiCare of California (PacifiCare or the HMO) and the medical group that is his primary health care provider, Sharp Rees-Stealy Medical Group, Inc. (SRS), seeks a writ of mandate setting aside an order of the superior court that struck his allegations of entitlement to punitive damages against SRS. Palmer contends the trial court misinterpreted the protective provisions of Code of Civil Procedure 1 section 425.13, which require an order to amend a pleading to add…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Pegram v. HerdrichSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Rush Prudential HMO, Inc. v. MoranSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  3. Fein v. Permanente Medical GroupCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Western Steamship Lines, Inc. v. San Pedro Peninsula HospitalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Central Pathology Service Medical Clinic, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Scripps Clinic v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
  2. Lathrop v. Healthcare Partners Medical GroupCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
  3. Canister v. Emergency Ambulance Service, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2008
  4. Regents of the University of California Ex Rel. Hospitals Auxiliary of the Medical Center v. Principal Financial GroupDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2006
  5. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API