Legal Opinion
In re Mohammad
California Supreme Court
Decided January 3, 2022No. S259999PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA In re MOHAMMAD MOHAMMAD on Habeas Corpus. S259999 Second Appellate District, Division Five B295152 Los Angeles County Superior Court BH011959 January 3, 2022 Chief Justice Cantil-Sakauye authored the opinion of the Court, in which Justices Corrigan, Liu, Kruger, Groban, Jenkins, and Levy* concurred. Justice Liu filed a concurring opinion in which Justice Kruger concurred. __________________________ * Associate Justice of the Court of Appeal, Fifth Appellate District, assigned by the Chief Justice pursuant to article VI, section 6 of the California…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Dyna-Med, Inc. v. Fair Employment & Housing CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
- Lungren v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- People v. GardeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- Arias v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
- People v. WoodheadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Criminal Justice Legal Foundation v. Dept. of Corr. & Rehab.California Court of Appeal · 2025
- Flores v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2022
- Huy Trong Tran v. California Department of Corrections and RehabilitationDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2022
- Huy Trong Tran v. California Department of Corrections and RehabilitationDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2022
- In re HicksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2023
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.