Legal Opinion

Qualchoice, Inc. v. Robin Rowland

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided May 11, 2004No. 02-3614PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MOORE, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiff-Appellant QualChoice, Inc. (“QualChoice”), a fiduciary and administrator of an employee benefits plan governed by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), appeals from the district court’s dismissal, for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, of its action to obtain reimbursement under the terms of that plan from Defendanfi-Appellee Robin Rowland (“Rowland”), a plan participant. QualChoice raises three claims of error on appeal. First, QualChoice argues that the district court had jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331, as federal…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Mertens v. Hewitt AssociatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Great-West Life & Annuity Insurance v. KnudsonSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. The Ohio National Life Insurance Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
  5. Betsy L. Nichols, Plaintiff-Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Muskingum College, Defendant-Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Sereboff v. Mid Atlantic Medical Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
  2. Longaberger Co. v. KoltCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
  3. Primax Recoveries, Inc. v. Joan Gunter and William GunterCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
  4. Moore, William v. CapitalCare IncCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2006
  5. Gilchrest v. Unum Life Insurance Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API