Legal Opinion

Smith v. CROWN FINANCIAL SERV. OF AMERICA

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided March 2, 1995No. 22964PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

In October 1988, Dean Smith and Rachael Smith, doing business as Jane Enterprises (“appellants”), filed a complaint alleging damages in excess of $110,000 for breach of contract and misrepresentation, and for an accounting of sales of a toy product known as the “Zing Ring” or “Groove Tube.” Appellants had executed a “Letter of Intent” with Michael Dooling, the president of Crown Financial Services of America, which in turn was the general partner of the toy manufacturer, Injection Mold Partners, Inc. (collectively referred to as “respondents”). The letter of intent provided that…

3Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Farmers Group, Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
  2. Bergmann v. BoyceNevada Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Application of FilippiniNevada Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Schouweiler Ex Rel. Baker Place Condominium Homeowners Ass'n v. Yancey Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1985
  5. City of Las Vegas v. Cragin Industries, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 1970

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by25 opinions

  1. Lee v. GNLV CORP.Nevada Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Thomas v. City of North Las VegasNevada Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Gumm v. MainorNevada Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Weddell v. StewartNevada Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Valley Electric Ass'n v. OverfieldNevada Supreme Court · 2005

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API