Legal Opinion

Gumm v. Mainor

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided December 26, 2002No. 38424PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

This appeal from a post-judgment order provides us with an opportunity to clarify what constitutes a special order made after final judgment, which is substantively appealable under NRAP 3A(b)(2). We have generally held that a post-judgment order, to be appealable, must affect the rights of the parties growing out of the final judgment, but this standard has proved inadequate. Here, for example, the order does not technically affect the rights of the “parties” growing out of the final judgment, but only the rights of the plaintiff, his trial attorneys and various lienholders to receive…

3Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Rust v. Clark County School DistrictNevada Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Albert H. Wohlers & Co. v. BartgisNevada Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Alvis v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Smith v. CROWN FINANCIAL SERV. OF AMERICANevada Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Casino Operations, Inc. v. GrahamNevada Supreme Court · 1970

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by38 opinions

  1. Winston Products Co. v. DeBoerNevada Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Peck v. CrouserNevada Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Mason v. CuisenaireNevada Supreme Court · 2006
  4. YOUNT VS. CRISWELL RADOVAN, LLCNevada Supreme Court · 2020
  5. Arevalo v. ArevaloNevada Supreme Court · 2022

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API