Gumm v. Mainor
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
This appeal from a post-judgment order provides us with an opportunity to clarify what constitutes a special order made after final judgment, which is substantively appealable under NRAP 3A(b)(2). We have generally held that a post-judgment order, to be appealable, must affect the rights of the parties growing out of the final judgment, but this standard has proved inadequate. Here, for example, the order does not technically affect the rights of the “parties” growing out of the final judgment, but only the rights of the plaintiff, his trial attorneys and various lienholders to receive…
3Cases cited14 opinions
- Rust v. Clark County School DistrictNevada Supreme Court · 1987
- Albert H. Wohlers & Co. v. BartgisNevada Supreme Court · 1999
- Alvis v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1983
- Smith v. CROWN FINANCIAL SERV. OF AMERICANevada Supreme Court · 1995
- Casino Operations, Inc. v. GrahamNevada Supreme Court · 1970
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by38 opinions
- Winston Products Co. v. DeBoerNevada Supreme Court · 2006
- Peck v. CrouserNevada Supreme Court · 2013
- Mason v. CuisenaireNevada Supreme Court · 2006
- YOUNT VS. CRISWELL RADOVAN, LLCNevada Supreme Court · 2020
- Arevalo v. ArevaloNevada Supreme Court · 2022
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.