Legal Opinion

Valley Electric Ass'n v. Overfield

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided March 10, 2005No. 41858PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Maupin, J.:

This case presents an issue of first impression for Nevada, whether district courts in eminent domain actions may award landowners attorney fees under NRS 18.010. We conclude that fees are available under the statute.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Appellant Valley Electric Association, a non-profit utility cooperative, filed the condemnation action below to secure an easement over respondents’ land for the installation and maintenance of an electrical power transmission line. Respondents (the Overfields) rejected Valley Electric’s $6,000 pre-suit settlement offer,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. Bodcaw Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Smith v. CROWN FINANCIAL SERV. OF AMERICANevada Supreme Court · 1995
  3. State v. DavisHawaii Supreme Court · 1972
  4. City of Las Vegas Downtown Redevelopment Agency v. PappasNevada Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Parodi v. BudettiNevada Supreme Court · 1999

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Davis v. BelingNevada Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Thomas v. City of North Las VegasNevada Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Fry v. Dinan (In Re Dinan)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  4. Sobel v. Hertz Corp.District Court, D. Nevada · 2014
  5. Casun Invest, A.G. v. Michael PonderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API