Valley Electric Ass'n v. Overfield
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By the Court,
Maupin, J.:
This case presents an issue of first impression for Nevada, whether district courts in eminent domain actions may award landowners attorney fees under NRS 18.010. We conclude that fees are available under the statute.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Appellant Valley Electric Association, a non-profit utility cooperative, filed the condemnation action below to secure an easement over respondents’ land for the installation and maintenance of an electrical power transmission line. Respondents (the Overfields) rejected Valley Electric’s $6,000 pre-suit settlement offer,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. Bodcaw Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Smith v. CROWN FINANCIAL SERV. OF AMERICANevada Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. DavisHawaii Supreme Court · 1972
- City of Las Vegas Downtown Redevelopment Agency v. PappasNevada Supreme Court · 2003
- Parodi v. BudettiNevada Supreme Court · 1999
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Davis v. BelingNevada Supreme Court · 2012
- Thomas v. City of North Las VegasNevada Supreme Court · 2006
- Fry v. Dinan (In Re Dinan)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Sobel v. Hertz Corp.District Court, D. Nevada · 2014
- Casun Invest, A.G. v. Michael PonderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.