Wolf v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
MACK, Associate Judge:
This is an appeal from a decision of the District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment granting an area variance. Petitioner has argued that the Board erred in holding the proposed variance to be one of area alone; that it also erred in finding, as a requisite for granting the variance, practical difficulties in conforming the subject property to zoning regulations; and that it erred in the procedure followed with respect to both the hearing and actual decision in the instant case. For reasons discussed herein, we affirm the Board’s decision.
The structure for which the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Red Lion Broadcasting Co. v. Federal Communications CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Bowles v. Seminole Rock & Sand Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Unemployment Compensation Comm'n of Alaska v. AragonSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Power Reactor Development Co. v. International Union of Electrical, Radio & MacHine WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Washington Canoe Club v. District of Columbia Zoning CommissionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
- Gilmartin v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning AdjustmentDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- Monaco v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning AdjustmentDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
- Friendship Neighborhood Coalition v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning AdjustmentDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
- Lenkin v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning AdjustmentDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1981
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.