Gates v. . McKee
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
If this were the first time that an instrument of this character had been before a court, and we were now called upon to construe it without the light of adjudged cases, the first inquiry would naturally be whether the limit of $500 related to the amount of purchases to be made by M.E. McKee or to the defendant's ultimate liability; and I think it clearly qualifies the responsibility of the defendant and not the amount of M.E. McKee's future transaction with the plaintiff. It is as if he had said "I will be responsible to the amount of $500 for what stock M.E. McKee has had or may want…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Douglass and Others v. Reynolds and OthersSupreme Court of the United States · 1833
- Drummond v. Executors of PrestmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1827
- Fellows v. PrentissCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1846
- Bell v. BruenSupreme Court of the United States · 1843
- Dobbin v. BradleyNew York Supreme Court · 1837
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- Smith v. . MollesonNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
- Evansville National Bank v. KaufmannNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
- Manry v. Waxelbaum Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1899
- Utica City National Bank v. GunnNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
- London & San Francisco Bank, Ltd. v. ParrottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.