Legal Opinion

Fowler v. COURTEMANCHE

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1954PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrand, J.

This is an action at law for compensatory and punitive damages on account of the alleged wrongful and malicious conversion of a number of logging trucks and trailers and certain other logging equipment. The plaintiff is Irwin W. Fowler. The defendants named in the complaint were L. A. Courtemanche, an individual, L. A. Courtemanche, a corporation, Automotive Equipment Company, a corporation, and The Courtemanche Acceptance Corporation. The case against L. A. Courtemanche, an individual, was dismissed. There was a verdict for plaintiff in the sum of $9,240.69 as general damages and $35,000 as…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Montgomery Ward & Co. v. DuncanSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Van Lom v. SchneidermanOregon Supreme Court · 1949
  3. State of Oregon v. GarverOregon Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Pelton v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Martin v. CambasOregon Supreme Court · 1930

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Honda Motor Co. v. ObergSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Hillman v. Northern Wasco County PUDOregon Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Wiebe v. SeelyOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Schafer v. Fraser Et UxOregon Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Douglas v. Humble Oil & Refining CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1968

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API