Legal Opinion
Harcourt v. Stockton Food Products, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 30, 1952No. Civ. 8172PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPeek, J.
This is an appeal by plaintiff from a judgment in favor of defendant in an action by plaintiff to recover brokerage fees. The appeal is on a settled statement of facts in lieu of transcripts under rule 7 (b) of the Rules on Appeal.
The settled statement discloses that appellant is an individual engaged in the business of food brokerage in San Francisco. Respondent is a canning company with its principal place of business in Stockton.
In May of 1946, after negotiations, the parties entered into an agreement reading:
“May 13, 1946.
“Stockton Pood Products, Inc.
Stockton, California.
Attention: Mr. W.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Barham v. BarhamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Golden Gate Packing Co. v. Farmers' UnionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
- Snook v. PageCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915
- Wilck v. HerbertCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- Faith v. MeisetschlagerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Parks v. UnderwoodCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1955
- Nicholas v. BursleyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1960
- H. I. Stahlman, Jr., General Partner, and Wife, Mrs. J. S. Stahlman, Limited Partner, D/B/A Stahlman Lumber Company, Ltd. v. National Lead CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963
- Carlsen v. ZaneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Wise v. Reeve Electronics, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1960
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.