Legal Opinion

Faith v. Meisetschlager

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 15, 1919No. Civ. No. 3044PublishedCited by 14 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Fresno County. H. Z. Austin, Judge. Affirmed. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtKerrigan, J.

This appeal is from a judgment in favor of the defendant in an action brought by plaintiff for the recovery of the sum of one thousand five hundred dollars, claimed as commissions for the sale of real property.

The contract was entered into by plaintiff’s assignor and defendant, and that portion necessary for a discussion of the ease reads as follows:

“Fresno, Cal., April 15, 1918.
“I hereby appoint the Action Realty Company of Fresno my agent, with the exclusive right to sell the property described on the reverse side of this card for the price and under the conditions hereon described, or for…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Snook v. PageCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Houston v. WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
  2. Shea v. Second Nat. BankCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1942
  3. Wilck v. HerbertCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  4. H. I. Stahlman, Jr., General Partner, and Wife, Mrs. J. S. Stahlman, Limited Partner, D/B/A Stahlman Lumber Company, Ltd. v. National Lead CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963
  5. Carlsen v. ZaneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API