Legal Opinion

Rieman v. Anderson

Montana Supreme Court

Decided April 8, 1997No. 96-456PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Turnage

David and Francis Rieman, Dianne and Allen Christmann, Guy and Janice Weimer, and Richard Tebay (Appellants) sought a determination of their easement right to use the Nutting Ditch and its laterals, damages caused by interference with that right, and attorney fees. The Thirteenth Judicial District Court, Yellowstone County, concluded that Appellants’ predecessor in interest had abandoned his ditch easement, and awarded attorney fees to Respondents. We affirm.

Appellants raise five issues on appeal:

1. Do Respondents have standing to raise abandonment?

2. Did the District Court err when it…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Interstate Production Credit Ass'n v. DesayeMontana Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Jim's Excavating Service, Inc. v. HKM AssociatesMontana Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Stewart v. Bd. of Cty. Com'rs of Big Horn Cty.Montana Supreme Court · 1977
  4. McDonnell v. HuffineMontana Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Thomas v. BallMontana Supreme Court · 1923

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Armstrong v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 1999
  2. In re M.J.W.Montana Supreme Court · 1998
  3. McDermott v. CARIE, LLCMontana Supreme Court · 2005
  4. State v. GomezMontana Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Durden v. Hydro Flame Corp.Montana Supreme Court · 1998

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API