Legal Opinion

State v. Gomez

Montana Supreme Court

Decided May 8, 2007No. 05-651PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rice

¶1 Appellant Robert Michael Gomez (Gomez) appeals his conviction in the District Court for the Eleventh Judicial District, Flathead County, of operating an unlawful clandestine laboratory, a felony. We affirm.

¶2 Gomez raises the following issues on appeal:

¶3 (1) Did the District Court err in denying Gomez’s motion to suppress evidence based on a warrantless search of:

a. the motor home, with the landlord’s consent?

b. the padlocked duffel bag, pursuant to exigent circumstances?

¶4 (2) Did the District Court err in denying Gomez’s motion in limine made pursuant to M. R. Evid. 404(b) regarding…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Unified Industries, Inc. v. EasleyMontana Supreme Court · 1998
  2. State v. MartinezMontana Supreme Court · 2003
  3. In re M.J.W.Montana Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Johansen v. State, Dept. of Natural ResourcesMontana Supreme Court · 1998
  5. State v. WeaselboyMontana Supreme Court · 1999

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Stevens v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp.Montana Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Griffith v. Butte School District No. 1Montana Supreme Court · 2010
  3. State v. LewisMontana Supreme Court · 2007
  4. State v. Coby McOmberMontana Supreme Court · 2007
  5. State v. ReichmandMontana Supreme Court · 2010

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API