Legal Opinion

Rice v. City of Milwaukee

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided September 20, 1898PublishedCited by 26 opinions

Appeal from an order of the superior court of Milwaukee county: Geo. E. Sutheeland, Judge. They argued, among other things, that in order to be available in reduction of the outstanding indebtedness the cash on hand must be lawfully applicable to the payment of such indebtedness.

Read the full summary

Appeal from an order of the superior court of Milwaukee county: Geo. E. Sutheeland, Judge. They argued, among other things, that in order to be available in reduction of the outstanding indebtedness the cash on hand must be lawfully applicable to the payment of such indebtedness. If such cash belongs to a particular fund pledged by law for a specific purpose, against which there is no outstanding indebtedness, the amount of cash belonging to such specific fund cannot reduce, within the meaning of the constitution, the amount of other outstanding indebtedness. French v. .Burlington, 42 Iowa,…

1Opinion of the CourtBardeen, J.

The plaintiff seeks in this action to restrain and enjoin the defendant the city of Milwauhee from issuing three series of its corporate bonds, aggregating $300,000. The city had passed ordinances providing for the issue of $80,000 of so-called “garbagedisposalbonds,” $80,000 “bridge bonds,” and $140,000 “bonds for permanently improving streets,” and was about to issue the bonds when this suit was commenced. The plaintiff secured a preliminary injunction from a court commissioner, and an order to show cause before the court why such injunction should not be continued pending the suit. The…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Earles v. WellsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Crogster v. Bayfield CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1898

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Public Market Co. v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Linden Land Co. v. Milwaukee Electric Railway & Light Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Overall v. City of MadisonvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1907
  4. State Ex Rel. La Follette v. StittWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
  5. City of Stamford v. Town of StamfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1928

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API