Legal Opinion

United States v. Rene Sanchez-Gomez

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 31, 2017No. 13-50561, 13-50562, 13-50566, 13-50571PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Dissent by Judge Ikuta

KOZINSKI, Circuit Judge:

We consider whether a district court’s policy of routinely shackling all pretrial detainees in the courtroom is constitutional.

BACKGROUND

In 2013, the judges of the Southern District of California acceded to the U.S. Marshals Service’s request for “a district-wide policy of allowing the Marshals Service to produce all in-custody defendants in full restraints for most non-jury proceedings.” “Full restraints” means that a defendant’s hands are closely handcuffed together, these handcuffs are connected by chain to another chain running around the…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Cohens v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1821
  2. Miller v. GammieCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  3. Genesis HealthCare Corp. v. SymczykSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  4. Schlagenhauf v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. Deck v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 2005

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. United States v. Sanchez-GomezSupreme Court of the United States · 2018
  2. Zermeno-Gomez v. United States District Court for the District of ArizonaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  3. United States v. Raymond HendersonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
  4. State v. OsbornCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
  5. United States v. Aracelis AyalaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2019

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API