Deck v. Missouri
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Breyer
We here consider whether shackling a convicted offender during the penalty phase of a capital case violates the Federal Constitution. We hold that the Constitution forbids the use of visible shackles during the penalty phase, as it forbids their use during the guilt phase, unless that use is “justified by an essential state interest” — such as the interest in courtroom security — specific to the defendant on trial. Holbrook v. Flynn, 475 U. S. 560, 568-569 (1986); see also Illinois v. Allen, 397 U. S. 337, 343-344 (1970).
I
In July 1996, petitioner Carman Deck robbed, shot, and killed an…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Lockett v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Illinois v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Zant v. StephensSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by852 opinions
- State v. WardSupreme Court of Kansas · 2011
- Brown v. DavenportSupreme Court of the United States · 2022
- United States v. Marvin BakerCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
- State v. McKnightOhio Supreme Court · 2005
- People v. Kopp, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
847 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.