Legal Opinion
Zermeno-Gomez v. United States District Court for the District of Arizona
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 25, 2017No. 17-71867PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
On May 31, 2017, this court held in United States v. Sanchez-Gomez, 859 F.3d 649, 661 (9th Cir. 2017) (en banc) that before placing a defendant in shackles, the district court must “make an individualized decision that a compelling government purpose would be served and that shackles are the least restrictive means for maintaining security and order.” About two weeks later, this court granted the government’s motion to stay the mandate, so the government could seek full en banc review or file a petition for a writ of certiorari.
Citing the stay of the mandate, several judges within the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Holly W. BAUMAN Et Al., Petitioners, v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, Respondent, Union Oil Company, Real Party in InterestCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- Patricia Hart v. Larry G. Massanari, Acting Commissioner of Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Hoeun Yong v. Immigration and Naturalization Service,opinionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Jesus Gonzalez v. State of ArizonaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- In Re Cement Antitrust Litigation (Mdl No. 296)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Joseph Brown v. SageCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2019
- Alvarez v. SessionsDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2018
- Brookens v. AcostaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Cox v. Dep't of JusticeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2024
- United States v. LittleCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2024
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.