Whitney v. City of Port Huron
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to St. Clair. (Canfield, J.) Assumpsit. Defendant brings error. The-facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtMorse, J.
The plaintiff sues to recover taxes paid by her under protest on a special assessment levied for the-paving of Pine Grove avenue, in the city of Port Huron. She had judgment in the court below, the verdict of the-jury being directed by the circuit judge in her favor.
The first objection to this'judgment is that the plaintiff had no right to sue at the time she did. The charter of Port Huron in force at the time this suit was commenced provides that it shall be a sufficient bar and answer to any action or proceeding in any court for the-collection of any demand against said city that it was…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- City of Detroit v. MartinMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
- Louden v. SaginawMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
- Twiss v. City of Port HuronMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
- Crittenden v. City of Mt. ClemensMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
3Cited by21 opinions
- Eugene Cole and Mary Cole, His Wife v. Thomas A. Cardoza, District Director, United States, Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1971
- Battle North, LLC v. Sensible Housing Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2015
- Robinson v. KhanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1998
- Michigan National Bank-Oakland v. WheelingMichigan Court of Appeals · 1988
- Moore v. City Council of PerrySupreme Court of Iowa · 1903
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.