Twiss v. City of Port Huron
Michigan Supreme Court
Appeals from St. Clair. (Stickney, J., presiding.) Bills filed to set aside assessments. Complainants appeal. The facts are stated in the opinions.
1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, C. J.
Both of these cases are suits in equity to relieve the respective complainants from the burden of illegal assessments. The court below, which was the circuit court for the county of St. Clair, dismissed the bills, and complainants appealed.
The assessments are complained of on various grounds, ’some relating to the invalidity of the proceedings of the common council of Port Huron, and some to injurious irregularities.
The assessments were for grading and paving a long street in Port Huron, which was divided into two districts by the resolution, and there is some reason to think the division…
2Cited by13 opinions
- Kutsche v. FordMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
- Talbot Paving Co. v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
- Aplin v. FisherMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
- Whitney v. City of Port HuronMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
- Zorn v. Warren-Scharf Asphalt Paving Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1907
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.